• author
    • Matthew Najmowicz

      Columnist
    • November 14, 2014 in Columnists

    In defense of Kim Kardashian’s tits and ass

    splash news kim k

    Kim Kardashian source- Splash News

    The internet was all abuzz on Wednesday, November 11, as one Kim Kardashian attempted to “break the Internet.” How did she try to break the Internet?

    Like this.

    Of course, with Kim Kardashian posing for an internet website in that fashion, all the mouth-breathers on the Internet collectively bashed Kim Kardashian.

    Here are the first few reactions I read on Papermag’s website.

    Trashy.  I guess that is why she is standing in a black garbage bag.

    Kar TRASH ion!

    Her sis is getting all the attention so guess what? She wants the street (rats) to remember that body.

    Okay, so this is the standard celebrity hating reactions, one suspects.  But then, the context changed and is the main focus of the conversation I want to have with my dear reader.

    Very sad to see  — quote —”your mother” showing her oversized big ass, fake tits and Photoshopped waist. Hope her kid or kids never see this. Kim you should be ashamed!!!!! Where is the motherly pride? GUESS IT WENT SOUTH.

    It’s not that I’m defending her, but just because you have a kid doesn’t mean you stop being who you are, or stop living.

    (A response to the previous comment) [name redacted] as a parent you’re supposed to protect your kids. This type of stuff WILL come back, and the child will suffer from it. Watch the kid get multiple DUIs and become a drug addict.

    Apparently, because Kim Kardashian did full frontal nudity for some website and magazine, her kid will become a drug addict and drive drunk. Allow me to offer a different conclusion.

    If she wiggles and jiggles, she can probably make some fat stacks.

    If Kim Kardashian does full frontal nudity, then her child and the people who work for her will have money in their pockets. If pussies were a stock on the Dow Jones Index, it would be the biggest blue chip on the market.  Sex always sells. They use sex to sell anything. They use sex to sell crappy hamburgers. They use sex to sell football.

    If you want to increase the sales of your used bookstore, put a few hot chicks barely wearing anything in front of the property. Want to sell bad chicken wings and watered down beer? Put in a bunch of young women barely wearing anything as the waitresses and call the place Hooters. I have been in Hooters once in my life and I can’t remember the food or actually seeing any owls. But I remember the waitress hitting on me to squeeze more dough out of me.

    Why do you think FOX News does well in the ratings? Why do you never see a female anchor who is over 50 on national news? Sex sells in the media. Why do they strategically place Kimberly Guilfoyle on the end of the table next to a male troll on the FOX News show The Five?

    The answer is obvious.

    Kimberly Guilfoyle  October 4 2011  Source Stephen Lovekin Getty Images North America

    Kimberly Guilfoyle October 4 2011 Source Stephen Lovekin Getty Images North America

    We live in an envy culture. Pretty people always win and the ugly people better create the next Apple computer or they get to mop floors for the rest of their lives. It’s absolutely unfair, but that’s the world we choose to live in.

    It’s easy to hate Kim Kardashian. It’s easy to hate someone who only has to show her naked body and watch her bank account overdose. But I’m willing to bet that you don’t hate Kim Kardashian because you think she is a dimwit and doesn’t contribute anything useful to society — you hate her because secretly you want to have life that easy too.

    No one ever complains about how a man makes his money and yet Kim Kardashian is a mom who provides for her child, and everyone lines up to punch her in the gut and call her a whore.



    • We like big butts and we cannot lie. :/


      • Hannah Sullivan

      • November 14, 2014 at 9:33 am
      • Reply

      We all love to hate The Kardashians.


      • Kat

      • November 15, 2014 at 8:57 am
      • Reply

      That picture made me want to eat roasted chicken slicked with it’s own juices, mashed potatoes laden in gravy. I’m now questioning my heterosexuality.



    • Matt, I have to agree with you, on a superficial level, but going deeper, the big butt photo has a more historical context. Before addressing the historical context, I have to say I don’t care about nudity, nude mothers, tits, ass, or sex. It’s not about that. It’s about race and history. Paper magazine said their trope would “break the internet” and be “history making”. There is nothing historically new about putting the female form on display. And specifically, there is something old and colonial about putting a dark woman’s body on display for the novelty of the form.
      Ms. Magazine does a great job exploring the tropes. http://msmagazine.com/blog/2014/11/14/kim-kardashian-the-butt-of-an-old-racial-joke/ In reference to the original colonial display of ‘big butts that cannot lie”, “So while everyone else was arguing over Kim’s K’s right to show her butt, my focus was on something else entirely. When I looked at the spread all I saw was a not so subtle reincarnation of Saartjie Baartman—imagery that is steeped in centuries of racism, oppression and misogyny.” Here’s a link to Saartjie from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saartjie_Baartman.
      This “Venus” was put on exhibit for her curves, specifically, her “shelf-butt”. After death, she was dissected and both her curves and her vagina were put on display.

      When I see Kim K on display, I cringe over the historical exploitation of women, the colonial display of otherness, and the stupidity of wanting the attention of being on display. Jesse


      • Ana

      • November 17, 2014 at 6:29 pm
      • Reply

      Based on how great reading this was, I would have guessed you actually had an EPIC weekend. Encore.



    Leave a Comment